21st Century Civil Rights, Missouri-Style
Sad day in Missouri.
The people of the Show Me State have spoken, and they have shown us that they are against equal marriage rights for gays. Thus, the ludicrous anti-marriage movement takes an embarassing step forward. I've said it before, these people are going to be horribly ashamed in thirty years. Or... maybe not. Maybe they'll go to their graves with hearts full of inexplicable hate for gay people.
It's hard to know what to do when democracy goes awry like this, but it's not like our country hasn't seen it before:
After the war, Southern state legislatures, dominated by former
Confederates, passed laws known as black codes that severely limited the rights
of blacks. The codes were slightly different from state to state, but they
usually contained limitations on black occupations and property owning, and
vagrancy laws under which blacks could be forced to work for whites if they were
considered unemployed. Mississippi, for example, prohibited blacks from renting
property in towns or cities and provided severe penalties, including fines or
imprisonment, for blacks who did not sign labor contracts agreeing to work for
whites. These codes effectively segregated blacks into the rural areas of the
state where they were virtually forced to become farm workers. Laws were also
passed that segregated schools, courts, and juries. The black codes successfully
prevented the newly freed slaves from improving their status in society.
Here's hoping that other states refuse to follow Missouri's shameful example, and that the Supreme Court of the United States finds Missouri's Anti-Gay Amendment unconstitutional.
2 Comments:
Good post, Abe. Yes, it was disheartening news about the vote in Missouri. And also disheartening that a constitutional initiative has qualified for the ballot in Montana to do the same thing -- restrict marriage to one boar and one bitch. Well, maybe I should be more PC -- one man and one woman.
Now, Montana's Supreme Court beat the US Supremes by five years. In 1998, it decided Gryzcan v. State, holding that the state law making homosexual conduct a felony violated the Montana constitutional right of privacy. Appallingly, the Montana Legislature, in three successive sessions, has shot down bills to amend that law. Elected legislators on the floor of their chambers have avowed that "once we get the Court in line, it'll reverse precedent." Then we can begin, I guess, to string up those dykes and faggots.
It really does make a reasonable person sick.
Johnny Piano
A month or so ago, in a moment of feeling like I needed to do something that would be a complete waste of my time, I sent letters (emails) to my senators here in the ultra-progressive state of Kentucky expressing my disgust over the prospect of the gay marriage amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I received a letter in the mail about a week ago from one of them "thanking me for my support of the constitutional amendment" and explaining to me that though he disappointingly lost the battle to save marriage, it's not over and he would continue to fight for God-fearing people like me. I was livid. I haven't composed myself to write a letter in return. I'm not naive enough to believe that these people read every word of anything I send them, but at least get the position right.
Post a Comment
<< Home